Britain's Privy Council quashes murder conviction of New Zealand businessman Mark Lundy



BRITAIN'S Privy Council has quashed the conviction of a New Zealand businessman who had received a life sentence for the murders of his wife and daughter and ruled that he should be granted a new trial in New Zealand.

It was an unusual intervention by the Privy Council Judicial Committee, which at the height of the British Empire was a very powerful body but still retains important powers now as a last ditch court of appeals.

A five-judge panel ruled in favour of Mark Lundy, who was convicted in New Zealand in 2002 after a jury decided he had attacked his wife Christine, 38, and his daughter Amber, 7, with a weapon similar to a tomahawk at the family home.

Christine Lundy's friend Christine Lockett told TVNZ she felt numb about the decision.

"I never thought it would get to this, I really didn't. I thought that Mark would remain in jail for the full term so it really hits you hard, really hard."

Supporters however said there was a "welter of evidence" from reputable experts which cast doubt on the methods the Crown used in several aspects of his prosecution.

Factual, a group which has supported Lundy's defence since his convictions, says it's thankful for the decision.

The "emphatic" decision upheld what the group had long maintained as inconsistencies and misinformation which need to be reconsidered in light of these accepted revelations, it says in a statement.

"Now that the verdict has been found to be unsafe Factual sincerely hope that the Crown will re-investigate this crime in the search for truth. There are many unanswered questions that need to be re-evaluated."

Lundy received a mandatory life sentence and his appeal was dismissed by the New Zealand Court of Appeals later in 2002.

He eventually had his lawyers bring the matter before the Privy Council, which had the authority to hear the appeal because New Zealand did not have its own Supreme Court until 2003.

Lundy brought the case before the Privy Council committee in November, more than 10 years after losing his initial appeal in New Zealand. His lawyers argued that he suffered a "substantial miscarriage of justice" when he was initially convicted. They argued that the verdict was unreasonable and not supported by the evidence.

The appeal was heard by four judges from Britain's Supreme Court and one senior New Zealand judge. Lundy's lawyers convinced the judges that fresh evidence should be considered in a new trial.

Lundy is now in his mid-50s. The council said he should remain in prison in New Zealand until his bail request can be heard by the High Court there.



Original report here

　

　

　

(And don't forget your ration of Wicked Thoughts for today. Now hosted on Wordpress. If you cannot access it, go to the MIRROR SITE, where posts appear as well as on the primary site. I have reposted the archives (past posts) for Wicked Thoughts HERE or HERE or here