Monday, March 01, 2010



NY: Alleged Killer Wants a New Trial in Exotic Dancer Murder Case

Paul Cortez, who in 2007 was convicted of murdering dancer Catherine Woods in her upper East Side apartment, wants his conviction reversed and is requesting a new trial because of "inept" representation, according to an appeal which notes that his lawyers didn't show up until the fourth day of his trial. Cortez is currently serving a sentence of 25 years to life.

Cortez' new lawyer, Jeffrey Lichtman, a high-profile New York attorney who has represented John Gotti Jr. and has appeared with Curtis Sliwa on radio, filed the appeal in New York State Supreme Court.

The appeal is based on several points of law but saves his most scathing analysis for Cortez' former attorneys Laura Miranda and Dawn Florio. "Paul Cortez received an unfair trial by virtue of unprepared and inept defenders who mishandled critical evidence due to unwaived - and unwaivable - conflicts of interest," the brief states. "(Cortez') conviction should be reversed."

Miranda and Florio were handpicked by Cortez but did not appear for the first three days of his trial when the jury was to be chosen. After making the judge, her client, and everyone else wait for hours, Miranda faxed a letter to Judge Carol Berkman claiming that her mother had suffered an illness and that she - Miranda - had flown to Puerto Rico unexpectedly. Florio, meanwhile, claimed to be at a relative's funeral. The absence of both lawyers meant that Cortez was "literally unrepresented" as his trial began, the brief states.

The judge fined Miranda $1,000 and held her in contempt of court. As for Florio, she was already under indictment by the Manhattan District Attorney's office, charged with slipping contraband to an inmate, a fact that clearly gave her a conflict of interest, according to the appeal.

Cortez, who had been the lead singer in a band and a devotee of the Hindu religion at the time of the murder, was a talented singer and actor who had won scholarships to elite schools throughout his early life. Catherine Woods was a small-town girl from Columbus, Ohio, who moved to New York to pursue her dream of dancing on Broadway.

She eventually turned to exotic dancing to earn money. She and Cortez, who was also a personal trainer, met at a gym and he repeatedly tried to convince her to give up exotic dancing, a source of conflict between the two.

Woods was found stabbed to death on November 27, 2005 in her one-bedroom apartment on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. Her male roommate and sometime boyfriend David Haughn had left the apartment for approximately 20 minutes so he could pick up his car and drive Woods to the club where she was dancing. When he returned, Haughn said he found Woods stabbed to death.

The case against Cortez largely was circumstantial except for a bloody fingerprint which police say was found on Woods' bedroom wall. Police said it matched Cortez and District Attorney Peter Casolaro told the jury that it could only have been made during the murder. Cortez, who took the stand in his own defense, maintained that he had been in Woods' apartment many times and had probably touched that wall.

One of the criticisms in the appeals brief is that Cortez' defense attorneys did not hire any independent experts to refute forensic testimony despite the fact that money had been allotted by the court. Lichtman called that "a lethal default" and went on to state: "There was no excuse for counsels'...failing to put on a forensic rebuttal case."

Original report here



(And don't forget your ration of Wicked Thoughts for today. Now hosted on Wordpress. If you cannot access it, go to the MIRROR SITE, where posts appear as well as on the primary site. I have reposted the archives (past posts) for Wicked Thoughts HERE or HERE

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

For more details of this pathetic injustice: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vU3xG9rOx0

Anonymous said...

Paul Cortez should get a new trial. There is no way the had enough evidence to convict him. This man got hung in the press. The case against him was an absolute joke.