Friday, March 16, 2007



A PLAY TO SEE

American jurisprudence tells us from day one that we are presumed innocent until proven guilty. But for the wrongly accused, that presumption is turned on its head. They remain guilty until proven innocent.

For people who are convicted of crimes they did not commit, the cards of the court system are stacked against them. Perhaps their race or sexual orientation puts them at risk within a racist, homophobic criminal justice system. Perhaps they just had the extreme misfortune to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Undoubtedly, they do not have the financial resources to hire any "dream team" of defense attorneys available to the more affluent.

Victims of prosecutorial misconduct, these people may face the ultimate miscarriage of justice - being put to death before anyone can bring to light their lack of culpability and overturn their conviction. Even if they are one of the lucky ones set free, they receive no restitution and, in most states, are not allowed to sue.

"The Exonerated" was written in 2000 by Jessica Blank and Erik Jensen, two actor playwrights who traveled across the United States and interviewed 60 people who'd been sentenced to die and had then had their convictions overturned. Their play was culled from six of those interviews and shaped into the interwoven monologues that form its backbone.

Under the direction of Broadway veteran Allen Fitzpatrick, New Everett Theatre is staging a powerful production of "The Exonerated" that continues its creators' mission to right this wrong.

One of the more harrowing stories belongs to Kerry Max Cook, played by Daniel E. Fling. Cook was convicted in 1978 of murdering a female acquaintance. Authorities pinned the crime on him because of what they termed his "homosexual perversion." Wrongly imprisoned in Texas for 22 years, he sat on death row from 1978 to 1997, and came within 11 days of execution before being exonerated when DNA evidence proved him innocent. "They said that would be the final nail in the coffin," Cook says in the play. "Instead, it finally took the nail out." Cook had been given a public defender who was paid $500. "And in Texas," he says, "you get what you pay for."

Another chilling account belongs to Sonia "Sunny" Jacobs, played by Kathrine L. Newman. Jacobs was convicted in 1977 of murdering two policemen and wrongly imprisoned in Florida for 16 years. Her husband, Jesse Tafero, was wrongly executed for that same crime in 1990, two years before his wife's conviction was overturned. Jacobs didn't get to see her children grow up, and her parents died in an accident en route to visit her in jail. Tafero's death by electrocution achieved notoriety when it was botched. Flames shot out of his head, and the executioners had to pull the switch three times to stop his breathing. In the play, Sunny addresses the hopelessness of her incarceration. "They take your clothes and give you a number. (You're) locked in a tomb. (It's) like being thrown to the bottom of the well."

Delbert Tibbs, portrayed by Clyde E. Grant Sr., was wrongly convicted in 1974 of rape and murder and imprisoned for three years. In the play, his voice is that of a poetic rapper who seems to spring from a Greek chorus. "It's not easy bein' a poet here," he says of his jail existence. On one side, he's fighting the judicial system, and on the other, he's fighting attacks within prison.

Other testimonies are offered by Gary Gauger (Michael Trepp), imprisoned in Illinois for three years after being wrongly convicted in 1993 of murdering his parents; David Keaton (Jeffery Brown), wrongly convicted in 1971 of murder and imprisoned in Florida for two years; and Robert Earl Hayes (Curtis Sims), wrongly convicted in 1991 of raping and murdering a co-worker, then imprisoned in Florida for six years. Hayes, a black man, was convicted by a jury made up of 11 whites and one black.

Asa Sholdez and Paul Benz are frighteningly convincing in their portrayals of Southern, white, racist law enforcement officers. The production incorporates black and white photos of cell blocks projected behind the chairs actors sit on until it's their turn to speak. Also effective are such sound effects as steel bars clanging shut or the high voltage buzz of an electric chair. "The Exonerated" allows us all to feel the nightmare of trying to defend yourself against allegations of a crime you didn't commit. For the disenfranchised among us, that social injustice becomes a nightmare from which they may not awake.

Report here




(And don't forget your ration of Wicked Thoughts for today)

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

"The Exonerated" - anti truth, anti victim - are any actually innocent?
Dudley Sharp, Justice Matters, contact info below

The Exonerated is a true story just as CATS and The Lion King are.

Reviews of each case, with links for your own review.

1) Sunny Jacobs -- After the shooting, still at the scene of the murders, a trooper asked Jacobs: "Do you like shooting troopers?" Jacobs response: "We had to." There is no evidence to support a claim of innocence for Jacobs in the murder of two police officers in Florida. She eventually pled guilty to two counts of second degree murder and was released for time served, after 16 years. Hardly a finding of innocence.

The best review of the blatant dishonesty of this "Exonerated" case is

-- "The Myth of Innocence", By Josh Marquis
The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, March 31, 2005
Northwestern University School of Law, Chicago, Illinois
joshmarquis(dot)blogspot.com/2005/03/myth-of-innocence.html


-- "The Innocent and the Shammed", By Josh Marquis
New York Times, January 26, 2006
joshmarquis(dot)blogspot.com/2006/01/innocent-and-shammed-nyt-oped.html


-- "Not Guilty Isn't the Same as Innocent:
One DA's crusade to point out the fatal flaw in Court TV's The Exonerated
Michael Miner, CHICAGO READER, February 05, 2005
joshmarquis(dot)blogspot.com/2005/02/one-das-crusade.html

Mr. Marquis can be reached at CoastDA@aol.com, or 503-791-0012.

also go to pages 40-46 at
www(dot)floridacapitalcases.state.fl.us/Publications/innocentsproject.pdf


2) Robert Earl Hayes Nothing about Hayes’ retrial changes the appeals court’s original observation that evidence existed to establish Hayes’ guilt.

Hayes has now been convicted of a nearly identical murder in New York, which was committed prior to the murder in Florida. Go to

no. 74 at http://www.prodeathpenalty.com/DPIC.htm
and pages 43-46 at www(dot)floridacapitalcases.state.fl.us/Publications/truelyreport.pdf


3) David Keaton -- Keaton's defense attorney stated that even without Keaton's numerous confessions, that the eyewitness testimony was likely sufficient to convict Keaton for the capital murder.

Through the testimony of numerous eyewitnesses, Keaton's numerous confessions, as well as those of co-defendants, Keaton was sentenced to death. There is no credible claim for innocence in this case of robbery/murder. The case was overturned on appeal. The prosecution chose not to re prosecute for a number of good reasons -- 1. he was no longer subject to the death penalty, because of changes in the law 2. Keaton was sentenced to 20 years in prison for a robbery that he committed ten days prior to the robbery/murder for which he was sentenced to death and 3. illness of witnesses.

Keaton was sentenced to death in 1971, under the old death penalty law. He was on death row for 13 months when the US Supreme Court overturned all death penalty cases in Furman v Georgia.

read pages 56-65 at www(dot)floridacapitalcases.state.fl.us/Publications/truelyreport.pdf


4) Delbert Tibbs -- The Florida Supreme Court candidly conceded that it should not have reversed Tibbs' conviction since the evidence was legally sufficient.

The state prosecutor who chose not to retry Tibbs recently explained to the Florida Commission on Capital Crimes that Tibbs “was never an innocent man wrongfully accused. He was a lucky human being. He was guilty, he was lucky and now he is free."

See no.10 at http://www.prodeathpenalty.com/DPIC.htm
and pages 123-127 at www(dot)floridacapitalcases.state.fl.us/Publications/truelyreport.pdf


5) Kerry Max Cook -- The judge, in accepting Cook's no contest plea, said that Cook was guilty of the crime and that the state was capable of proving its case.

This is not a DNA exoneration case.

Mr. Cook was convicted of the murder of Linda Jo Edwards, who was found in her apartment on June 10, 1977, beaten on the head with a plaster statue, stabbed in the throat, chest and back and sexually mutilated. Mr. Cook was arrested 2 months later where he worked as a bartender in Port Arthur. Officers said they found Mr. Cook's fingerprint on Ms. Edwards' apartment door. At first he denied knowing Ms. Edwards. Cook lied. He later said they met at the apartment complex's swimming pool and he went to her apartment. His original conviction resulting in a death sentence was overturned because of prosecutorial misconduct. A 1992 retrial ended in a hung jury. He was again convicted and sentenced to death in 1994. That verdict was overturned in 1996. Before a 4th trial, Mr. Cook pleaded no contest to a reduced charge of murder. He was sentenced to 20 years time served. Mr. Cook took the deal so he could avoid a possible return to death row. By taking the plea, both Cook and his attorneys conceded that this is hardly a case where there is no evidence for guilt and certainly not a case with confirmable actual innocence.

for more on this case, contact David Dobbs at david (at) davidedobbs.com


6) Gary Gauger -- Gauger confessed to the murder of his parents. That confession was thrown out based upon the lack of probable cause to arrest him -- not because it was a false confession.
However, two motorcycle gang members are incarcerated in the murders, based upon their discussions of the murders, gathered from law enforcement wiretaps. There was a connection between Gary, his parents and motorcycle gangs. Motorcyclists would shop at the Gauger's farm store. Even though there is speculation of a connection between Gary and the two convicted motorcyclists, law enforcement has not been able to confirm one.

Speculation as to actual guilt or innocence will continue in this case.

Furthermore, the trial court erroneously imposed a death sentence. The court granted a motion for reconsideration and vacated the sentence less than ten months later in September 1994. The trial court found that it had not considered all the mitigating evidence and concluded that Gauger should not be sentenced to death. People v. Bull, 705 N.E.2d 824, 843 (Ill. 1999); Chicago Tribune (9/23/94). Gauger served a brief time on death row. He was not properly sentenced to death by the trial court. He should never have been sent to death row because the trial court did not finally sentence him to be executed. Gauger’s case is an example of how consideration of mitigating evidence under current law results in a sentence less than death.
see no. 69 at www(dot)prodeathpenalty.com/DPIC.htm


Some additional articles:

"Cross-Examination for a Drama That Puts the Death Penalty on Trial", Adam Liptak, New York Times, January 27, 2005
www(dot)nytimes.com/2005/01/27/theater/newsandfeatures/27pros.htm


"Prosecutors take exception to Court TV film", Richard Willing, USA TODAY, 1/24/05http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-01-24-exonerated_x.htm


"The Myth of Innocence:Don't believe everything you see on CourtTV", Joshua Marquis, National Review, 1/27/05 www(dot)nationalreview.com/comment/marquis200501270742.as

---------------------------

Audiences are being duped to further a political/social agenda. Theater critics simply don't bother to fact check and blindly accept and repeat whatever the producers tell them.

Only one theater critic, Tom Sime of the Dallas Morning News, bothered to see if the claims were true. His brief review resulted in this published comment: "Maybe three are actually innocent and three actually aren't. In any case, blind faith - in the criminal justice process or in the truth of crusading art- is best left at home."

"The Exonerated" is strictly a bit of anti-death penalty deception, which is not at all surprising. It appears that the Soros Foundation, through their Open Society Institute (OSI) is the primary benefactor of "The Exonerated" . The Soros Foundation may well be the largest financier of anti death penalty efforts, worldwide.

As their website states: "The Exonerated" —a new documentary play produced by The Culture Project a grantee of OSI's Criminal Justice Initiative and Arts Initiative—focuses on the stories of six innocent men and women who spent years on death row before being set free thanks to new evidence and emerging DNA technology." from sorosny(dot)org/crime/

Copyright 2002-2007

Dudley Sharp, Justice Matters
e-mail sharpjfa@aol.com, 713-622-5491,
Houston, Texas

Mr. Sharp has appeared on ABC, BBC, CBS, CNN, C-SPAN, FOX, NBC, NPR, PBS, BBC and many other TV and radio networks, on such programs as Nightline, The News Hour with Jim Lehrer, The O'Reilly Factor, etc., has been quoted in newspapers throughout the world and is a published author.

A former opponent of capital punishment, he has written and granted interviews about, testified on and debated the subject of the death penalty, extensively and internationally.

Pro death penalty sites
www(dot)cjlf.org/deathpenalty/DPinformation.htm
www(dot)clarkprosecutor.org/html/links/dplinks.htm
www(dot)dpinfo.com
www(dot)homicidesurvivors.com
joshmarquis(dot)blogspot.com/
www(dot)lexingtonprosecutor.com/death_penalty_debate.htm
www(dot)prodeathpenalty.com
www(dot)prodeathpenalty.org/
www(dot)yesdeathpenalty.com/deathpenalty_contents.htm (Sweden)
www(dot)wesleylowe.com/cp.html

Anonymous said...

Go to District Attorney, Josh Marquis' own county, via Clatsop County Dried Salmon Message Board, and see what the locals think of his skewing numbers and manipulating cases. He recently was the first DA to have his stipend stripped in Oregon and that had nothing to do with a lean county budget! He's running for National District Attorney Association President and can't even keep the records for a small county of 35,000 people, pads the case load to make it look like his office is prosecuting 7,000+ cases a year so that he can have two additional staff in his office leaving him free to travel the country and appear on Court TV. What he writes should be gone over with a fine tooth comb. In essence, he is a poor researcher and rarely does a thorough job. If Justice Matters then don't call on Josh Marquis.