Houston man claiming wrongful conviction could be released from prison

A judge this morning cleared the way for a Houston man's release while he awaits word on whether he will get a new trial in a case in which he says he was wrongly imprisoned. Gilbert Amezquita, 29, could walk free as soon as this afternoon. State District Judge Belinda Hill set his bail at $5,000. Today's decision resulted from a ruling last month by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, which granted Amezquita a hearing.

Amezquita has been in prison since his 1998 conviction for the aggravated assault of a Houston woman. As she lay in a hospital, Kathy Bingham told police, "Gilbert did it." She later identified Amezquita, a co-worker, in a photo lineup. But his attorney, Roland Moore, argued in his appeal that Harris County prosecutors failed to consider another Gilbert: Alonzo Gilbert Guerrero, who also worked with Bingham. On the day of the attack, Guerrero, who had a criminal record that included assault, argued with the victim. Court records also show he had the woman's cellular phone after the attack.

Guerrero is serving a seven-year sentence in a state prison for a 2004 burglary in Cameron County, according to state records. Before Amezquita's trial, Judge Hill refused to allow the testing of DNA evidence, which has since been destroyed. [Evidence enough of corrupt proceedings and certainly evidence of an unsafe conviction]

In a 2003 interview with the Houston Chronicle, Moore said that "everything that could have gone wrong in (the Amezquita) case did go wrong." The Harris County District Attorney's Office has not announced how it will proceed in the case. After the appeals court's ruling last month, however, an assistant district attorney noted that the ruling was not based on Amezquita's claim of actual innocence but on ineffective assistance of counsel in the trial.

Report here

Some background:

The whereabouts of a cell phone played a role in the state's highest criminal court throwing out the conviction of a man who served about half of a 15-year prison sentence for aggravated assault. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted a writ of habeas corpus Wednesday to 29-year-old Gilbert Amezquita, who has been in prison since his 1998 conviction in the brutal beating of a Houston woman who was in a coma for 10 days after the workplace attack. When she regained consciousness, Kathy Bingham couldn't tell police who attacked her, but when asked again later, she whispered "Gilbert," according to court records. She also testified during the trial that Amezquita, a co-worker, was her attacker.

Roland Moore, Amezquita's attorney, argued on appeal that Harris County prosecutors failed to consider another co-worker named Alonzo Gilbert Guerrero, who the appeals court said exchanged Bingham's cell phone for drugs shortly after the attack. Guerrero, who had a criminal record that included assault at the time of the attack, is serving a seven-year sentence for a burglary.

When police asked her about the missing cell phone, Bingham said she hadn't noticed it was gone. The appeals court faulted Amezquita's trial attorney for not raising the issue. "While there is no direct evidence that Guerrero was the attacker, the circumstantial evidence supports such a conclusion," the appeals court wrote in its 5-4 ruling.

According to testimony from the trial, Guerrero argued around the day of the attack with Bingham's brother about Guerrero's alleged harassment of her. But Bingham also had a heated argument with Amezquita about the same time. Harris County Assistant District Attorney Baldwin Chin said prosecutors will meet next week to decide whether to release Amezquita or retry the case. Moore said his client could be released on bail as early as next week. "This is the best present I've ever gotten," Moore said of the ruling.

Amezquita's case languished in the appeals court for five years, said Steve Hall, director of the criminal justice reform group StandDown Texas Project. That included an unusual sequence last year when the court rejected Amezquita's appeal but decided to reconsider it two weeks later. Before the trial, state District Judge Belinda Hill refused to allow the testing of DNA evidence from fingernail scrapings, which have since been destroyed. Moore said in 2003 that the Amezquita case was one where "everything that could have gone wrong ... did go wrong."

Report here



(And don't forget your ration of Wicked Thoughts for today)